The overall evidence favors delaying initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) until indications (e.g., severe hyperkalemia or refractory fluid overload) develop. How long RRT can be safely delayed isn’t known. Studies generally demonstrate no benefit in starting RRT in asymptomatic patients or at a specific eGFR cutoff compared with watchful waiting and initiating RRT for symptoms or metabolic abnormalities that are refractory to medical treatment. However, a recently published study suggests there may be a limit after which postponing was associated with potential risk. In the AKIKI 2 trial, 278 critically ill patients with severe AKI, no urgent indications for RRT, and either oliguria for 72 hours or a blood urea nitrogen (BUN) between 112 and 140 mg/dL were randomly assigned to initiate RRT immediately or to defer RRT until either an urgent indication developed or BUN exceeded 140 mg/dL. RRT was ultimately initiated in 79% of those assigned to defer RRT. At 28 and 60 days, mortality was higher in the deferred RRT group (45% vs 38% and 55% vs 44%, respectively), although these differences were not statistically significant. These findings may suggest that while early initiation of RRT is not preferred, there may be limits beyond which delaying RRT is no longer beneficial.
References: AKIKI 2 Trial